Did George Bush provoke the Tal Afar attack?
At and surrounding Bush's press conference, he made the point that the insurgents in Iraq are media saavy, and they know that killing large numbers of people will get them press coverage, thus affecting US opinion, thus impacting the war effort. So, although he said he admittedly understood why the media did this, he rather carefully tried to draw a connection between their reporting and deaths in Iraq. It was their fault.
Okay, you want to play that game of loose affiliation causal blame?
At and surrounding that same press conference, Bush touted the great success that was taking place in Tal Afar. There have been several reports from several media sources disputing this rosy scenario, but for the sake of our "which American is impeding US efforts" game, let's just say it's true.
Okay, so Bush points to Tal Afar as a success story, the media saavy insurgents see this, and within a couple days send a suicide bomber into an army recruitment center outside Tal Afar "killing at least 40 people and wounding at least 30 others, an official at the Interior Ministry said." Connection?
Probably not, quite frankly. I think this type of causal argument is weak, and I thought I'd use this illustration to point that out.
Okay, you want to play that game of loose affiliation causal blame?
At and surrounding that same press conference, Bush touted the great success that was taking place in Tal Afar. There have been several reports from several media sources disputing this rosy scenario, but for the sake of our "which American is impeding US efforts" game, let's just say it's true.
Okay, so Bush points to Tal Afar as a success story, the media saavy insurgents see this, and within a couple days send a suicide bomber into an army recruitment center outside Tal Afar "killing at least 40 people and wounding at least 30 others, an official at the Interior Ministry said." Connection?
Probably not, quite frankly. I think this type of causal argument is weak, and I thought I'd use this illustration to point that out.
3 Comments:
Except in this case it's probably true.
Reporters have said over and over again that if they publically disclose a "good" story, it's automatically a target. So I wouldn't be surprised if Bush's comments did elicit the attack.
But as you know, blaming the media is a red herring. The salient question is why would a comment from Bush be so radioactive?
By Greyhair, at 10:18 AM
It probably is, but I can't make the jump to definitely. If that was the only violence in Iraq the whole week, I would say definitely, but with so much action and confusion, this target might have been chosen for some other motiviation.
I think you're right, as the schools example you cite, but I'm just not willing to go all the way.
Mike
By mikevotes, at 11:33 AM
chenlina20150717
<
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet
www.louisvuitton.com
coach outlet
retro 11
marc jacobs outlet
michael kors outlet
coach outlet
burberry sale
jordan shoes
louis vuitton outlet
jordan 8 bugs bunny
jordan 11 columbia
louis vuitton outlet
discount christian louboutin
ray ban glasses
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet
gucci handbags
gucci bags
longchamp outlet
concord 11
michael kors outlet
oakley sunglasses
burberry sale
tod's outlet
coach outlet store online
hollister kids
jordan 11 snakeskin
louis vuitton handbags
michael kors handbags
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton
true religion
christian louboutin sale
oakley vault
coach outlet online
michael kors outlet
longchamp sale
hollister
By chenlina, at 12:28 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home