.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

"Tainted" at the CIA

Both the NYTimes and WaPo have major articles on the Obama administration seeking out a new DNI and head of the CIA. Both articles speak about the personnel and policy challenges brought about by the Bush administration's most egregious programs, rendition, torture, wiretapping......

BUT, what intrigues me is not that the two articles are so similar or appear on the same day, but that they both contain a form of the word "tainted."

NYTimes: "a message that “if you worked in the C.I.A. during the war on terror, you are now tainted,” and had created anxiety in the ranks of the agency’s clandestine service."

WaPo: "finding experienced leaders who understand the challenges facing the various U.S. intelligence agencies -- but who are untainted by the controversies and problems that have plagued the intelligence apparatus during the Bush era. "

That's not a word that comes out of nowhere, here. That word is being used with commonality somewhere, either in the Obama transition or, more likely, within and around the intelligence community.

I just find it interesting.

4 Comments:

  • I first heard this sentiment when John Brennan withdrew himself from consideration. I believe it was he who expressed the senitment -- with a hint of exasperation -- that all experienced, higher-level CIA personnel who served through the Bush years were being caught up in the same net of "tainted"-ness. Not so much by the Obama people, but the liberal commentators and "bloggers."

    My bet is Brennan is the source (a source) for both articles.

    By Blogger -epm, at 8:38 AM  

  • Good bet that Brennan is the guy.

    Plus he has a vested interest in explaining why he wasn't chosen, as he shops himself to consultancies.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 10:39 AM  

  • I'm anticipating the 'we were only following orders' interviews...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:46 PM  

  • You know, frankly, I'm kinda predisposed to accepting that argument from the rank and file CIA guys. The Bush folks did a reasonable enough job muddying the legal waters that the guys in the field might deserve some exception for their actions.

    The people who muddied the law and made the decisions, however, did know what they were doing.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 12:53 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home