McCain's precarious Iraq stance
In a rather interesting post covering yesterday's WaPo story where Gen. Petraeus complains loudly about a lack of political progress in Iraq, Juan Cole points out,
Interesting. Particularly because McCain has been saying this,
So, good news in Iraq, good for McCain, and bad news in Iraq should be disregarded because "extremists" are trying to undermine him. Wow. He is George Bush.
UPDATE: Richard in the comments had this (no link, but it sounds credible):
It is worthwhile mentioning that what Gen. Petraeus said about the lack of political progress is the opposite of what John McCain has been saying.
Interesting. Particularly because McCain has been saying this,
Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Friday he fears that anti-American extremists might attempt spectacular attacks in Iraq to try to tilt the U.S. election against him.
So, good news in Iraq, good for McCain, and bad news in Iraq should be disregarded because "extremists" are trying to undermine him. Wow. He is George Bush.
UPDATE: Richard in the comments had this (no link, but it sounds credible):
Here is a direct quote from the Multi National Force-Iraq:
"Today's Washington Post inaccurately characterized the discussions General Petraeus and their reporters had yesterday. During the one-hour interview General Petraeus never intimated or stated that Iraqi leaders have "failed to take advantage of a reduction in violence to make adequate progress toward resolving their political differences."
The Washington Post has been asked to make a correction on this statement and we are awaiting their decision."
5 Comments:
No dummy, he.
By Anonymous, at 8:45 PM
No.
He's in such a weird spot. He can't abandon Bush or he'll make the majority of his party angy, but he also can't hug him too tightly because of the rest of us.
MikeVotes
By Anonymous, at 9:14 PM
Here is a direct quote from the Multi National Force-Iraq:
"Today's Washington Post inaccurately characterized the discussions General Petraeus and their reporters had yesterday. During the one-hour interview General Petraeus never intimated or stated that Iraqi leaders have "failed to take advantage of a reduction in violence to make adequate progress toward resolving their political differences."
The Washington Post has been asked to make a correction on this statement and we are awaiting their decision."
Don't believe everything you read in the Post.
By Richard S. Lowry, at 7:47 AM
Thank you Richard. I hadn't seen that and it is definitely part of this story.
I'm going to take your word on it without a link and add it as an update.
By mikevotes, at 8:12 AM
You are welcome. You might be interested in another post I wrote a week ago about progress in Iraq:
http://op-for.com/2008/03/the_rock_of_the_marne_1.html
Richard
www.marinesinthegardenofeden.com
By Richard S. Lowry, at 8:25 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home