.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Friday, October 05, 2007

Iraq

Take a minute to appreciate that when we talk about "corruption in Iraq," we're talking about at least $18 billion so far, and it's believed to be getting worse. ($100-150 to plant an IED. $100+ for an AK. $500,000 for 9/11....)

(Kuna) "The US army said Thursday its troops arrested one of the most major financiers of terrorism who is charged with delivering some USD 100 million to Al-Qaeda Organization in Iraq.... The detainee used to travel abroad to lobby and raise funds for Al-Qaeda, the statement said, noting that the man was charged of paying some USD 50,000 to Al-Qaeda members a month."

(NYTimes) "A police chief, a government official and a tribal leader who allied with American forces were killed in separate attacks across Iraq on Thursday."

(On the Iskandariyah mayor, (AP) "Suspicion for the killing fell on Shiite extremists jockeying for power ahead of expected provincial elections." (Don't hear about Shia roadside bombs very often.))

And, This is what battle looks like in Iraq
In Friday's pre-dawn raid on the Shiite militia members, U.S. aircraft repeatedly bombed the neighborhood in Khalis, a Shiite enclave about 50 miles north of Baghdad, according to an Iraqi army official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information. At least 24 were killed, 28 were injured, most of whom were in critical condition, and several others were missing, he said.

He said civilians were killed when they rushed out to help those hurt in the initial bombing.

But, frankly, there's really no other way to do it.

Later: On the same attack, (NYTimes) "Accounts Differ on U.S. Attack That Killed 25 Iraqis"

7 Comments:

  • Are we actively -- and intentionally -- working to keep Iraq instable? To keep the government irrelevant and impotent? We seem to be arming all sides of the insurgency at this point and it seems to make little sense -- to have no strategic vision.

    I think the Bushians are getting board with Iraq. Probably have been for a couple of years or so. That's why they're just blindly throwing guns and money at the problem and spending all their "vision" time on plotting a fresh fun-filled folly in Iran... All because the idiot boy king is bored.

    By Blogger -epm, at 10:58 AM  

  • My opinion is that we're trying to undermine the UIA (SIIC, DAWA bloc) to keep Iran's influence down while the US builds up the Sunnis.

    The new strategy is, in part, balancing the armed factions to find a center. Just my opinion though.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 11:47 AM  

  • I think you're right. With partition as the ultimate objective. Perhaps instead of Sykes/Picot we will see Clinton/Biden.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:50 AM  

  • But balancing armed groups is always such a tricky game.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 1:39 PM  

  • Doesn't really matter. Just keep the place unstable and keep sending arms. Ergo endless occupation.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:06 PM  

  • And no steady Iranian or Al Qaeda domination.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 3:19 PM  

  • ...just exasperating the potential to have the conflict overflow the boarders of Iraq and further destabilize the entire region.

    The balancing act presupposes a partitioned Iraq, either official or through ethnic cleansing and self ghettoing.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 9:48 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home