The cost of war
I made a similar argument to this some years ago regarding the opportunity cost of DoD spending, but this blurb in the Boston Globe realy puts the misallocation of resources into the Iraq war in perspective.
Which would have a greater effect on US world standing, the war in Iraq or feeding and educating the world?
According to World Bank estimates, $54 billion a year would eliminate starvation and malnutrition globally by 2015, while $30 billion would provide a year of primary education for every child on earth.
At the upper range of those estimates, the $456 billion cost of the war could have fed and educated the world's poor for five and a half years.
Which would have a greater effect on US world standing, the war in Iraq or feeding and educating the world?
3 Comments:
That is sobering and makes me want to weep.
By Handsome B. Wonderful, at 3:38 PM
And to think they call sharks cold blooded...
There are few greater evils than to have the power to do good, but choose to do nothing.
By -epm, at 6:40 PM
True.
I can't even begin to imagine the difference.
By mikevotes, at 7:04 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home