Talks of an Iran strike are back
Everytime the Bush admin tries to push for new political pressure on Iran, the consistently raise the specter of attacks on Iran through the backchannel. I never know how much of these are serious, and how much are posturing, but here we are again.
On the other hand, you do have to take this somewhat seriously because there are high figures in this administration who do want to attack Iran before their time is up. I don't know.
Six months ago, after American intelligence agencies declared that Iran had shelved its nuclear-weapons program, the chances of a U.S. or Israeli military strike on Iran before President Bush left office seemed remote.
Now, thanks to persistent pressure from Israeli hawks and newly stated concerns by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the idea of a targeted strike meant to cripple Iran's nuclear program is getting a new hearing.
As Bush travels across Europe to gain support for possible new sanctions against Iran, Israeli leaders have been working to lay the psychological foundation for a possible military strike if diplomacy falters.
In public threats and private briefings with American decision-makers, Israeli officials have been making the case that a military strike may be the only way to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions.
On the other hand, you do have to take this somewhat seriously because there are high figures in this administration who do want to attack Iran before their time is up. I don't know.
4 Comments:
Why is it always up to McClatchy to point out the obvious?
By Anonymous, at 8:53 AM
Have we reached a wag-the-dog point in our alliance with Israel? Is our blind defense of Israel, regardless of how incompetent their current leadership, actually damaging our national security? Will we ever be able to separate the State of Israel from the political governance of Israel -- so we can defend the one while denouncing the other?
Our current Israeli foreign policy is both an anchor around our foreign policy neck nor is it helpful for the state of Israel (though it's enormously helpful to conservative hawks in Israel).
----
I'm a naif on this subject and my questions and comments should be read with that in mind.
By -epm, at 11:53 AM
AIPAC is a very powerful force in American politics. But there are indications that this is changing...slowly.
I hope Mike won't mind me posting a couple of links...
http//www.jstreet.org
http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/
By Anonymous, at 1:11 PM
Anon, McClatchy were the only ones asking the qquestions pre-Iraq war.
Maybe it's because they don't really have high level access to endanger? If you read their stuff it usually sounds like it's sourced further down.
....
EPM, Those are all the big questions, and no, I don't have any perfect answers. I really do believe you have to "backstop" Israeli defense, but beyond that is where you get into the questions.
By mikevotes, at 3:07 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home