The Canada/Nafta story
When I found out the Canadian/Nafta "leak" came from the political Chief of Staff to the PM about a week ago, I kinda stopped covering this, recognizing it as a political hit job, but, if you're still watching, you probably should read this, and this.
There's now a claim that the Clinton camp made the first "rhetoric doesn't mean anything" statement.
If you want to go in there, go ahead, but I'm not dealing with it.
There's now a claim that the Clinton camp made the first "rhetoric doesn't mean anything" statement.
If you want to go in there, go ahead, but I'm not dealing with it.
4 Comments:
I think the "story" here is not the substance (or lack thereof) of the "leak," but the larger, shadowy, voter manipulation of the "incident." There are many players -- and many layers -- here.
I thing the entire political theater of this story -- from it's inception to its developing morphing a life of its own at the hands of politicians and bloviators -- to be an interesting case study for a political science major.
By -epm, at 9:10 AM
Yeah, but like most dirty tricks, you'll never get the full story.
By mikevotes, at 11:23 AM
I know. I'm kind of intrigued by the international political gaming that may have been in play. That's what makes this story so different from the run-of-the-mill American dirty politics, I think. I'm more interested in the character study of the players than the content of any "memo."
By -epm, at 12:12 PM
I think it's pretty clear, separate from the body of the story, that this was put out with the goal of interfering.
Hope they don't expect a favor early on.
By mikevotes, at 1:27 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home