.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

What's Bandar been up to?

There're big questions about the big money flushing around Prince Bandar in relation to the BAE thing, but I'm far more curious as to the operational side of it.
His reason for the low profile, according to diplomats, was that he was already in trouble with his boss, King Abdullah, having delivered diplomatic messages to the US that were not exactly in line with the monarch's wishes.

What does that mean? I'm highly suspicious about all of this.

Again, let's step back a couple days,
They (Cheney, Abrams, et al) have, however, suffered a recent setback in what we have described as their “Sunni strategy” to build support from the US’ conservative Sunni Arab allies (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the Gulf States) for a belligerent approach to Iran. This strategy was based on the Sunni fear of an ascendant Iran and of an Iraq falling into the Iranian sphere as another Shia major oil producer. Abrams worked closely with Prince Bandar bin-Sultan, the Saudi National Security Adviser, to push this plan forward. We hear that this has now been shelved at the insistence, we are told, of Saudi King Abdullah. The latter has distanced himself from Bandar who is spending much of his time outside Saudi Arabia at his homes in London and the US.

There's something going on here that I'm not seeing. There's $1 billion that we know about in virtually untraceable money channeled through BAE to Bandar up to 2004. Bandar is doing things in collusion with Iran contra figure Elliot Abrams and Dick Cheney. His current king disapproves of his actions, and Bandar is delivering messages "not exactly in line with the monarch's wishes."

Is that obliquely saying that Bandar is working outside his country's interest? Did all that money end up with Bandar, and if not, where, and to what persons or groups did it go?

A little reminder of history,
He proved of enormous value to the US when he channelled Saudi petrodollars into American-sponsored covert operations, including funding Nicaragua's Contras and the Arab fighters who battled the Soviet Union in Afghanistan (and eventually created the monster of al-Qaeda).

I don't know, but something tells me, something is up. (And it sounds like Bandar is going anywhere but Saudi Arabia right now.)

3 Comments:

  • A diversion, but still related to our policies on (against?) Iran, I found this snippet interesting:

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States will sanction more Iranian companies if it receives hard evidence of wrongdoing, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said on Wednesday.

    What I found interesting is that our leaders feel the need to have "hard evidence" before imposing economic sanctions against Iran, which presumably will pinch the pockets of some American billionaire corporate types, but all they need to start a war is a bad feeling in their gut? Follow the money I guess.

    By Blogger -epm, at 3:59 PM  

  • Yes, but note we're talking sanctions against specific companies (probably related to tech transfer.)

    This isn't the across the board effort, but trageted sanctions, and they need the "hard evidence" because they are going to be screwing contracts for specific western companies in the process.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 4:22 PM  

  • Oh sure... go all "thoughtful and reasonable" on me.... way to rain on my rage-parade.

    :)

    Seriously. I appreciate the bigger picture you provided.

    By Blogger -epm, at 7:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home