Undefining success in Iraq
President Bush today undefines success in Iraq.
So, "Success is not, no violence." It's some level of violence he deems acceptable.
(And, If you happen to catch a video of this, the "Either we'll succeed, or we won't succeed" line feels remarkably flip considering he's talking about 100 US soldiers dying a month from now until he reassesses in September.)
Oh, and 9/11 has been defined down as well,You can attack a nation several ways. One, you can get 19 kids to fly airplanes into buildings, or you can gain control of something a country needs and deny that country access to that, in this case, oil, and run the price of oil up, all attempting to inflict serious economic damage.
Those crazy kids..... (And, oil is now equivalent to the 3,000 Americans killed on 9/11.)
But in the end, the reality comes down to this.
The question is, who ought to make that decision? The Congress or the commanders? And as you know, my position is clear -- I'm the commander guy..
2 Comments:
Didn't the "commander guy" replace all his commanders in Iraq who differed with him?
By Lew Scannon, at 8:54 PM
'zactly.
In my mind, I keep thinking of Korea or Vietnam where they could always find some young gung ho officer who thought he could "take that hill."
Finding a military man who thinks it's possible is a long way from finding someone who can do it.
By mikevotes, at 8:59 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home