.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Friday, April 20, 2007

No more stand up/stand down. Now it's the US's fight all the way.

Stepping aside from the politics of the obvious failure of yet another Bush strategy in Iraq, think about what this means. It is now official policy and plan that the US is fighting a war of occupation.
Military planners have abandoned the idea that standing up Iraqi troops will enable American soldiers to start coming home soon and now believe that U.S. troops will have to defeat the insurgents and secure control of troubled provinces.

Training Iraqi troops, which had been the cornerstone of the Bush administration's Iraq policy since 2005, has dropped in priority, officials in Baghdad and Washington said......

But evidence has been building for months that training Iraqi troops is no longer the focus of U.S. policy. Pentagon officials said they know of no new training resources that have been included in U.S. plans to dispatch 28,000 additional troops to Iraq.


Although this will be frequently played as some version of "gotcha" because it represents the repudiation of an overworn and long inaccurate talking point, the underlying message is significant.

The unwritten subtext in this article is that the Iraqi government is dead. They exercise no influence and are not moving in any way towards reconciliation. The Bush administration and the military have given up on the Iraqis, and all that's left is to fight.

The last paragraph should scare the hell out of you because of its truth.
One State Department official, who also asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject, expressed the same sentiment in blunter terms. "Our strategy now is to basically hold on and wait for the Iraqis to do something," he said.

This whole article is worth a read.

4 Comments:

  • "Our strategy now is to basically hold on and wait for the Iraqis to do something."

    Ideas of grandeur aside, hasn't that been the working strategy the whole time?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:48 AM  

  • They at least expected and applied pressure on the Iraqis. IF they've truly given up, it means that this war is now a pointless drain even from their point of view. (with their knowledge.)

    They know that US troops are dying for nothing.

    I see a distinction there.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 12:22 PM  

  • The problem is at home.

    I am a 2 tour Vietnam Veteran who recently retired after 36 years of working in the Defense Industrial Complex on many of the weapons systems being used by our forces as we speak.

    Politicians make no difference.

    We have bought into the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). If you would like to read how this happens please see:

    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/03/spyagency200703

    Through a combination of public apathy and threats by the MIC we have let the SYSTEM get too large. It is now a SYSTEMIC problem and the SYSTEM is out of control. Government and industry are merging and that is very dangerous.

    There is no conspiracy. The SYSTEM has gotten so big that those who make it up and run it day to day in industry and government simply are perpetuating their existance.

    The politicians rely on them for details and recommendations because they cannot possibly grasp the nuances of the environment and the BIG SYSTEM.

    So, the system has to go bust and then be re-scaled, fixed and re-designed to run efficiently and prudently, just like any other big machine that runs poorly or becomes obsolete or dangerous.

    This situation will right itself through trauma. I see a government ENRON on the horizon, with an associated house cleaning.

    The next president will come and go along with his appointees and politicos. The event to watch is the collapse of the MIC.

    For more details see:

    http://rosecoveredglasses.blogspot.com/2006/11/inside-pentagon-procurement-from.html

    By Blogger RoseCovered Glasses, at 7:33 PM  

  • I agree completely.

    I always been a proponent of the conspiracy of system over the secret robed cabal.

    We currently have a system that has an interest towards interventionist resource and economic wars.

    Within the influential structure, there is no one rewarded by peace. That's not to say everyone likes every war, but there is not much of a motivation to avoid what are perceived to be minor conflicts (as Iraq was envisioned.)

    Within this structure there are interested factions, like the Cheney/Neocon nexus, but no one of them runs the show.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 9:23 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home