Yeeaaarrrggghhh!!!!!
The debate is not whether or not we should wiretap terrorism suspects!!!
The debate is whether or not it should be done without a warrant!!!
(Sorry, just had to get that out.)
The debate is whether or not it should be done without a warrant!!!
(Sorry, just had to get that out.)
posted by mikevotes at
7:02 PM
5 Comments:
You're so right to call this out. Give the right credit, tho -- they're very good at framing an argument (aka deception).
By
Anonymous, at 10:01 PM
Right. I realized I probably should've used a word besides "debate" because that implies that it's a matter with two sides rather than a right and wrong.
But I was pissed and not thinking when I wrote it. I'd just read one too many, "but without wiretapping..."
Mike
By
mikevotes, at 10:05 PM
I am so friggin tired of repeating that in BOLD when I discuss it..I don't get how people miss it for the love of god..
By
Unknown, at 12:33 AM
They miss it because the administration frames it that way. On the news, they show a clip of Bush pretty much saying that, and then it's not contradicted or explained.
Mike
By
mikevotes, at 9:42 AM
Or that they should wiretap anybody & everybody that has absolutely nothing to do with their "war on terror". I hit this hard today on my blog.
By
Chuck, at 4:13 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home