.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

The Charlie Brown press and the football of troop withdrawal

The press is falling for it again, interpreting this,
After talks with Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top American commander in Iraq, and Ryan C. Crocker, the ambassador to Iraq, Mr. Bush said that they “tell me that if the kind of success we are now seeing here continues it will be possible to maintain the same level of security with fewer American forces.”

Mr. Bush did not say how large a troop withdrawal was possible. Nor did he say whether he envisioned any forces being withdrawn sooner than next spring, when the first of the additional 30,000 troops Mr. Bush sent to Iraq this year are scheduled to come home anyway.


Into a headlines like this, "Bush, in Iraq, Says Troop Reduction Is Possible" or "Bush sees possible troop cuts in Iraq," or "Bush hints at US troop reduction in visit to Iraq."

Shouldn't the headline be, "Bush says he'll stick to current deployment schedules only if security improves"?

PS. Dear Press, you are being outsmarted by this man,
On Air Force One after leaving Iraq, Bush acknowledged that his comment about troop reductions had piqued interest. "Maybe I was intending to do that," the president said, sitting around a table with reporters in his plane's conference room as he flew to Australia to meet with Asia-Pacific leaders.

"If you look at my comments over the past eight months, it's gone from a security situation in the sense that we're either going to get out and there will be chaos, or more troops," the president said. "Now the situation has changed where I'm able to speculate on the hypothetical."
.

4 Comments:

  • The editors who write those headlines know what they're doing. So much for the 'liberal press'.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:24 AM  

  • The WaPo got it sort of right.

    The reason it matters is because for alot of people, that headline is the primary message they receive.

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 8:28 AM  

  • Surge = success. That's the message. I suspect the reality is different.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:03 AM  

  • The reality is mixed when you come down to it, but very much the same crappy mixture it has been for years.

    Where American troops stand, violence goes down (not disappears, but goes down.) There are not enough US troops to stand all across the country, therefore, the fighters just move. The Shia militias accomplish ethnic cleansing beneath the US presence. They are largely immune from serious US crackdown, meaning that almost all US fighting takes place against the Sunnis.

    The Shia still have no real reason to reconcile because everything continues to trend in their way. The "success" against Al Qaeda only benefits them.

    Iraq is creeping towards a Shia dominated state.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 1:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home