The "repudiation" narrative
It was interesting to watch yesterday as the ISG's report was slowly digested through the 24 hour media how the narrative slowly changed. Immediately after the release, most of the discussion was on the top line proposals and whether the Bush administration would take them on.
But slowly throughout the day, the "repudiation" narrative grew, probably most epitomized by this 9PM AP article, Panel: Bush's Iraq policies have failed.
The late announced visit by Tony Blair is accomplishing the White House's goal by, at the very least, forcing the Bush/Blair meeting into the headline space. They're trying to reset the news cycle away from "repudiation" and "failure." I'll be very curious to see how successful they are.
But slowly throughout the day, the "repudiation" narrative grew, probably most epitomized by this 9PM AP article, Panel: Bush's Iraq policies have failed.
WASHINGTON - President Bush's war policies have failed in almost every regard, the bipartisan Iraq Study Group concluded Wednesday, and it warned of dwindling chances to change course before crisis turns to chaos....
Nearly four years, $400 billion and more than 2,900 U.S. deaths into a deeply unpopular war, violence is bad and getting worse, there is no guarantee of success and the consequences of failure are great, the panel of five Republicans and five Democrats said in a bleak accounting of U.S. and Iraqi shortcomings. The implications, they warned, are dire for terrorism, war in the Middle East and higher oil prices around the world.
The late announced visit by Tony Blair is accomplishing the White House's goal by, at the very least, forcing the Bush/Blair meeting into the headline space. They're trying to reset the news cycle away from "repudiation" and "failure." I'll be very curious to see how successful they are.
6 Comments:
I finally finished reading it myself and posting on it (more as a personal excercise that for anyone to read).
I don't see how anyone can see it as anything but a total repudiation of the policies enganged in so far.
By Praguetwin, at 1:07 PM
I agree completely.
And, what's amazing to me is that they were really trying not to say that. From a quick reading, the only real criticism they directly level seems more intended to spur immediacy about the current state and need for change.
I guess the current state itself is a repudiation, eh?
Mike
By mikevotes, at 1:18 PM
True enough.
I noticed that the juicy stuff doesn't really come until the end. The criticism of the current level of expertise and the breakdown between the civilian leadership and the military leadership struck me as particularly critical.
That, and the call for Iraq expenses to be added to the budget request so that Congress could provide constitutional oversight.
Stinging if you read into it. Like you say, they were careful not to name names and point fingers, but the criticism is there in black and white if you read it right.
By Praguetwin, at 2:34 AM
There are some really accusatory bits like the budgeting and the reporting sections. But as you say, not overtly so.
Mike
By mikevotes, at 5:07 PM
adidas tubular
nike flyknit
reebok shoes
stephen curry shoes
kobe 11
nike lebron soldier 11
adidas eqt support
golden goose
Kanye West shoes
yeezys
By Unknown, at 3:25 AM
buffalo bills jerseys
pandora outlet
nike air huarache
air huarache
vikings jerseys
cheap oakley sunglasses
ralph lauren outlet
true religion outlet
kate spade sale
nike outlet
By raybanoutlet001, at 8:53 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home