.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Sunday, June 11, 2006

War is hell.

More questions on Zarqawi's death.
U.S. officials denied several news reports that Zarqawi was abused by U.S. troops before he died.

An Iraqi police lieutenant who said he was among the first people at the scene told The Times on Saturday that after Iraqi police had carried Zarqawi to the ambulance on the stretcher, U.S. troops took him off the stretcher and placed him on the ground. One of the Americans tried to question Zarqawi and repeatedly stepped on his chest, causing blood to flow from his mouth and nose, said the lieutenant, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

A man identified only as Mohammed, who said he lived near the Zarqawi hide-out, told Associated Press Television News that he had witnessed Americans beating Zarqawi. "They stomped on his stomach and his chest until he died and blood came out of his nose," he said.

A U.S. military spokesman said by e-mail Saturday that there was no evidence to support allegations that coalition forces had beaten the insurgent leader.

"Although Zarqawi was mortally wounded, a coalition medic treated him while he lapsed in and out of consciousness," the spokesman said.

Can you see the picture? A dying Zarqawi pulled off the stretcher and laid on the ground. An American soldier, foot on his chest, yelling questions at at him. Then a medic is brought in to try to revive him to continue the questioning. War is hell.

UPDATE:
The NYTimes has another interpretation, that the efforts to get Zarqawi to speak were part of the triage.

But more interesting to me is this line by the same witness, "Mr. Abbas also said the Americans handcuffed the police on the scene, took their shirts off and searched them."

(Note:
Let me say here, that I didn't intend to pass a value judgement on these actions. That's why I tried to frame this as "war is hell." Any intel that could've been gathered from a dying Zarqawi would have been practically priceless. It's just an ugly image of the reality of war.

I didn't mean to get so far into Zarqawi's last moments, but the LATimes description above was so vivid, and then I felt I should add the NYTimes rebuttal version. And honestly, I was regretting putting this up last night, but I don't think it's right just making it disappear.)

8 Comments:

  • I read about this...don't remember what news outlet...this guy Muhammed said that he was kicked in the chest several times. The way the rest of it read lead one to believe they were checking to see if he was strappped with a bomb belt. No matter...the result was the same...he died.

    By Blogger sumo, at 12:24 AM  

  • Sorry, you broke Shamshi adad. You broke the comment policy.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 8:46 AM  

  • Again, comment policy. No ad hominem. no cursing.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 9:20 AM  

  • If you want to criticize, that's fine. I really don't mind that. Just keep it clean.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 9:21 AM  

  • Have you alread covered the irony in how just a few weeks ago Zarqawi was shown in a gag-reel, and painted as a fumbling clown, and now the PR is back to how deadly this mastermind was.
    Also lots of stories about how the US actually did more to boost Zarqawi's social status that he could have himself. Namely get OBL's reluctant blessing.

    By Blogger zen, at 1:27 PM  

  • No, Zen. I haven't really connected the two. I did a couple posts on the "gag reel" when it came out, but I hadn't really tied the two together.

    I did do a post further down the page, on Zarqawi being promoted as a supervillian called "Zarqawi as a tool." (I kinda liked the double entendre.)

    But, I don't think it was just the US promoting him as supervillian.

    Al Qaeda benefitted from his inflated role, during their time in the wilderness, until he attacked the shrine in Samarra. The US benefitted in having a supervillian. The Iraqi gov't benefitted by being able to externalize the violence as the work of foreigners. The Sunni insurgency benefitted by using his image as an icon of foreign support and as a rallying point early in their fight.

    Then of course Zarqawi himself benefitted in profile, power, recruiting, and money.

    It was in everyone's interests to have this guy bigger than life until he bombed the shrine in Samarra. That was a turning point.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 2:51 PM  

  • Edit Copy turned me on to this article from the Atlantic.

    By Blogger zen, at 3:24 PM  

  • Man, that's good. I'd read a couple paragraph excerpt, but the whole thing really adds some depth.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 3:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home