Confirmation of White Phosphorus use as anti-personnel in Fallujah?
I've intentionally stayed out of the storyline regarding the use of "Chemical Weapons" in Fallujah. The Army officially denies using white phosphorus, but admits using the MK-77 firebombs (a newer cousin to napalm.) This admission is probably because the British Sunday Mirror already confirmed the use of MK-77 some time back(although that article is now curiously gone. Curious because with the current DoD admissions it was right.)
The RAI documentary showed some horrible images which it claimed were the result of white phosphorus burns, noting that the telling characteristic of this is that the skin has burned away, but the clothes remain intact.
Frankly, I don't know enough of the technical information about these weapons to discern the difference.
(There were some anecdotal reports from unembedded reporters of US Army Engineers coming in after Fallujah with heavy equipment to scrape off topsoil which was then trucked away, but, all of them were second hand and as we've heard no more of this, I find it hard to give it too much creedence.)
BUT. Today reading I was reading a piece by Mark Rothschild on Antiwar.com and he has come across this mention in the US Army publication Field Artillery magazine which describes artillery tactics used in Fallujah. ("The Fight for Fallujah" March-April 2005 edition)
Again, not being an expert, I don't know the terminology of "'shake and bake' missions," but to me this sounds like the use white phosphorus directly on people. I certainly don't believe they were targeting civilians, but whether that use carried over and affected civilians I don't know. But this certainly stands in direct conflict with the DoD statement.
No answers, just information.
The RAI documentary showed some horrible images which it claimed were the result of white phosphorus burns, noting that the telling characteristic of this is that the skin has burned away, but the clothes remain intact.
Frankly, I don't know enough of the technical information about these weapons to discern the difference.
(There were some anecdotal reports from unembedded reporters of US Army Engineers coming in after Fallujah with heavy equipment to scrape off topsoil which was then trucked away, but, all of them were second hand and as we've heard no more of this, I find it hard to give it too much creedence.)
BUT. Today reading I was reading a piece by Mark Rothschild on Antiwar.com and he has come across this mention in the US Army publication Field Artillery magazine which describes artillery tactics used in Fallujah. ("The Fight for Fallujah" March-April 2005 edition)
"a. Range of Munitions. The munitions at our disposal gave us excellent flexibility. …
(unfortunately, the link is to a PDF version of the article. this citation is on the fifth page of the article (page 26))Again, not being an expert, I don't know the terminology of "'shake and bake' missions," but to me this sounds like the use white phosphorus directly on people. I certainly don't believe they were targeting civilians, but whether that use carried over and affected civilians I don't know. But this certainly stands in direct conflict with the DoD statement.
No answers, just information.
6 Comments:
do you find it surprising that they would use such things?
By michael the tubthumper, at 11:09 AM
I enjoy your blog and have added a link to it on mine, which is called Covert History.
By gary, at 1:54 PM
Michael,
I don't know if I find it surprising, but it kinda falls into that weird area that this decision was probably made by someone higher up. Kind like our exchange yesterday, I can fully understand somebody losing it and doing something questionable in the heat of the moment, but I would think this is the kind of thing that would be decided by somebody not right on the lines, and I have trouble imagining that. To make that decision as a cool, rational choice at a desk, when the legal question of it could be considered, just seems kindof surreal to me.
So, no I'm not too surprised when considering everything else, but in another way, yes I am.
By mikevotes, at 3:48 PM
I'm not at all surprised, if you are in the field of battle and it is win at all costs and you have at your disposal such weapons then the line of thought will be to use them. Let's not forget the other important issue, these weapons were manufactured and suppied at the governemts request.
By Anonymous, at 4:47 PM
Good point John.
By mikevotes, at 4:49 PM
Hey Mike, thanks for that info...
I saw the quote from the Field Artillery magazine that you mentioned: "We used improved WP for screening missions when HC smoke would have been more effective and saved our WP for lethal missions."
WP is of course White Phosporous...
Just when I thought things couldn't get any worse....heh.
By reuben, at 10:48 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home