tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post115817406552788368..comments2007-03-11T10:59:17.850-05:00mikevoteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08010028700825655843noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1158198899642093752006-09-13T20:54:00.000-05:002006-09-13T20:54:00.000-05:00I know you're being satirical, but that possibility was actually in the original Bush plan. A detainee could be convicted to death without ever hearing the evidence presented against him.<BR/><BR/>Mikemikevoteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08010028700825655843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1158191223045076992006-09-13T18:47:00.000-05:002006-09-13T18:47:00.000-05:00Still amazes me you could go on trial, but not be told on what evidential basis because "it's a secret." Hey, why don't we just execute them for classified reasons?wild billnoreply@blogger.com