tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post113612652187112991..comments2007-03-11T10:57:10.591-05:00mikevoteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08010028700825655843noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136207616791368592006-01-02T07:13:00.000-06:002006-01-02T07:13:00.000-06:00Lib-dem, <BR/><BR/>Some will, some won't. <BR/><BR/>But I still haven't given up the hope that our country can be brought back through nonviolent means. So no violent revolution, but barricading the streets, yeah, I'm with that is that's what it takes.mikevoteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08010028700825655843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136173360139930132006-01-01T21:42:00.000-06:002006-01-01T21:42:00.000-06:00What about a 2nd American Revolution?<BR/><BR/>Baracades in the streets?<BR/><BR/>Yet the key question is this: will the National Guard shoot American citizens?liberal_demhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05759166598974062254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136145929737847832006-01-01T14:05:00.000-06:002006-01-01T14:05:00.000-06:00The illegality continues to spread like a rock thrown into a pond. I swear, we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg.<BR/><BR/>The only question will be this. Will anyone do anything about it? Will Republicans jump ship and hold Bush accountable? Will the voting public uphold the Constitution?<BR/><BR/>These are the key questions of 2006 for me!Greyhairhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05281477780178181651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136142882327037832006-01-01T13:14:00.000-06:002006-01-01T13:14:00.000-06:00Very possibly.<BR/><BR/>Mikemikevoteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08010028700825655843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136134670354314192006-01-01T10:57:00.000-06:002006-01-01T10:57:00.000-06:00<I>Bush will be shown to have lied in that 2005 press conference</I><BR/><BR/>And then?<BR/><BR/>Will most Americans have a group yawn and then go back to their own petty lives?liberal_demhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05759166598974062254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136132872942318172006-01-01T10:27:00.000-06:002006-01-01T10:27:00.000-06:00Kvatch, answered on your blog,<BR/><BR/>lib dem, I don't think we really have the truth on this yet. I have a feeling when the whole thing comes out, that Bush will be shown to have lied in that 2005 press conference when describing the "limited" nature of this.<BR/><BR/>Mikemikevoteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08010028700825655843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136130482965795302006-01-01T09:48:00.000-06:002006-01-01T09:48:00.000-06:00Holy crap! They're sharing the information...that they're not supposed to have in the first place. <BR/><BR/>Good catch, Mike. I totally missed this on Google News. I'm just going to whore this post, if you don't mind. And BTW...<A HREF="http://blognonymous.com/2006/01/tagged-from-one-to-six.html" REL="nofollow">TAG! You're it.</A><BR/><BR/>Happy new year!Kvatchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04849342568392852434noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14902719.post-1136128736015523042006-01-01T09:18:00.000-06:002006-01-01T09:18:00.000-06:00So, Mike, which side of Bush's mouth do you think is more accurate concerning the NSA, the one in 2004 or the one revealed by the press in late 2005?liberal_demhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05759166598974062254noreply@blogger.com